Hotărârea CEDO în cauza Ileana Roșu împotriva României (cererea nr. 74061/17)

Extrasele exacte din hotărâre la care trimit ghidurile.

1. par. 56 · textul original, în limba engleză

   While the length of time during which the restrictions remained in place is a crucial part of the Court’s assessment, the scope and nature of restrictions as well as the presence or absence of procedural guarantees are no less relevant (see Karahasanoğlu, cited above, § 151).

   Textul în documentul-sursă ↗

2. par. 57 · textul original, în limba engleză

   In view of the above, the Court considers that the measure was lifted on 21 July 2021. The total duration of the measure was therefore approximately five years and five months.

   Textul în documentul-sursă ↗

3. par. 66 · textul original, în limba engleză

   On the basis of the above-mentioned reports and domestic case-law, the Court observes that the applicant had the possibility to lodge an application before the civil courts in order to individualise her share of the assets owned jointly with her husband (see paragraph 38 above) and subsequently to ask the criminal court to lift the seizure measure in so far as it concerned her share of the seized property (see paragraph 39 above).

   Textul în documentul-sursă ↗

4. par. 68 · textul original, în limba engleză

   Moreover, throughout the duration of the measure, the applicant remained in possession of the seized assets and had not been deprived of the possibility of using them (contrast Călin, cited above, § 83).

   Textul în documentul-sursă ↗

5. par. 72 · textul original, în limba engleză

   There has accordingly been no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.

   Textul în documentul-sursă ↗

6. pagina de titlu, mențiunea FINAL · textul original, în limba engleză

   FINAL 16/10/2026 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.

   Textul în documentul-sursă ↗